I actually said "absolute nonsense", not "absolutely nonsense", which (along with your claim that "AI is evolving") are great places to start my response.
You're not careful with words. You don't seem familiar with their meanings. And you use them incorrectly. A lot.
This means that what you write is often contradictory, usually unsupported by applicable facts, and therefore mostly meaningless.
My article on Challenging Unrealistic AI Assertions (like yours), to which I provided a link (https://medium.com/@frickingruvin/challenging-unrealistic-ai-assertions-524452798510) in my original comment, calls out Incorrect Grammar, Leading to Ambiguity as the number one indicator of unrealistic assertions, followed by:
• The Lack of an Objectively Verifiable Definition of “Intelligence”
• Lack of Citation and
• Lack of Assessment Methodology
So, I don't need to define "absolute nonsense". These words already have well-established and clearly-understood meanings.:
ab·so·lute: having no restriction, exception, or qualification (https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/absolute)
non·sense: words or language having no meaning or conveying no intelligible ideas, language, conduct, or an idea that is absurd or contrary to good sense, things of no importance or value (https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/nonsense)
What you need to to is to familiarize yourself with them.
And while you're at it, you might also look up:
e·volve: to produce by natural evolutionary processes (https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/evolve)
AI is not doing that. At all.
Instead, AI is being slowly, painstakingly created and improved by conscious, human engineering effort, as it has been for the past 50+ years, not by the result of random mutation occurring over vast periods of time, the most well-adapted of which increases in numbers more than others.
Now returning to my statement that "Breathless AI hype [like yours] is always selling something", I offer the following advertisement in your article:
"The AI revolution isn’t just transforming technology — it’s creating the largest wealth-building opportunity since the Internet. Join my Be Limitless community to access cutting-edge AI strategies and investment insights." [my emphasis]
And there it is.
To be clear, I have nothing against helping people to navigate the changes being ushered in by AI or against helping them to profit from it, if possible.
I just don't think your article establishes your credibility in this area.
Yes, generative AI can retrieve and regurgitate information, on which it has been trained ... using terabytes of information entirely originated by humans. Until we started training it with information already regurgitated by AI. Like when farmers started feeding ground up cow protein to cows. Bovine spongiform encephalitis (Mad Cow disease), anyone? This doesn't end well.
But claiming (or insinuating) that AI is understanding and answering these questions is ... wait for it, absolute nonsense. That's not what's happening. That's not how AI works. At all.
Finally, I would be concerned about "investment insights" from someone who recommends Deepseek, which has been shown to have the ability to channel information provided to it directly to the Chinese government.
I'm not against AI. I use it almost daily. It's helpful. But I understand what it is, how it works, and therefore its limitations.
It's important to think carefully about the tools we choose to use, especially when advising others.
Please be more careful.
